June 8th, 2012

The Ecstasy Of Influence

For Harper’s Jonathan Lethem argues that all artists plagiarize, and advocates for a new understanding of artistic ownership and appropriation. 

In a courtroom scene from The Simpsons that has since entered into the television canon, an argument over the ownership of the animated characters Itchy and Scratchy rapidly escalates into an existential debate on the very nature of cartoons. “Animation is built on plagiarism!” declares the show’s hot-tempered cartoon-producer-within-a-cartoon, Roger Meyers Jr. “You take away our right to steal ideas, where are they going to come from?” If nostalgic cartoonists had never borrowed from Fritz the Cat, there would be no Ren & Stimpy Show; without the Rankin/Bass and Charlie Brown Christmas specials, there would be no South Park; and without The Flintstones—more or less The Honeymooners in cartoon loincloths—The Simpsons would cease to exist. If those don’t strike you as essential losses, then consider the remarkable series of “plagiarisms” that links Ovid’s “Pyramus and Thisbe” with Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet and Leonard Bernstein’s West Side Story, or Shakespeare’s description of Cleopatra, copied nearly verbatim from Plutarch’s life of Mark Antony and also later nicked by T. S. Eliot for The Waste Land. If these are examples of plagiarism, then we want more plagiarism.

Read the whole article here.

// Follow Read This, Not That on Tumblr / Facebook / Twitter //

  1. andrewsullivan reblogged this from rtnt
  2. soulofayoungman reblogged this from rtnt
  3. anthonylindel reblogged this from rtnt
  4. overflowingcharm reblogged this from rtnt
  5. kotuki reblogged this from rtnt
  6. mls-classics reblogged this from rtnt and added:
    For artist/author followers, mostly.
  7. rtnt posted this
Loading tweets...